| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

View
 

Noun Inflection

Page history last edited by David 14 years, 5 months ago

Nouns in Wistra-Gutisk are inflected for case, number, and grammatical gender. There are three grammatical genders: masculine, feminine, neuter. For nouns with clear sexual gender, the grammatical gender generally agrees with the sexual gender. For example, qens 'woman' is feminine, so that natural gender and grammatical gender agree; but graba 'ditch' is also feminine, though the referent has no natural gender. There are two numbers: singular and plural (though personal pronouns and verbs also have a dual number). There are four cases: nominative (N), accusative (A), genitive (G), dative (D).

 

Case inflection is essentially a means of marking by suffixes grammatical functions which would otherwise be signalled by prepositions in Modern English. The most obvious remnant of the older case system in English is 's (apostrophe-s), which at the end of a noun fills the same role as the preposition of before a noun. For example, the bark of a dog is the same as a dog's bark. In much the same way, the nouns of Wistra-Gutisk use suffixes in order to denote grammatical function within a clause. Below is a short description of the case system.

 

Wistra-Gutisk declension is more robust than that of Modern English, though more sparse than that of Sanskrit. One may then envision the syntax associated with the case system in terms of the following question: how do the eight logical cases fit into the four extant cases of Wistra-Gutisk? The following chart gives the cases, along with the logical cases whose role each has subsumed.

 

Wistra-Gutisk Case
Logical Case
Example
Translation
Nominative

Nominative

Vocative

frija ist þis witódis

atta unsar þu in himinam

'she is free of that law'

'our Father, thou in heaven'

Accusative

Accusative 

Vocative

gasaiƕiþ þana sunu mans

hails þiudan Júdaií

'ye shall see the son of man'

'hail, king of the Jews'

Genitive

Genitive

Ablative

gasaiƕiþ þana sunu mans

frija ist þis witódis

'ye shall see the son of man'

'she is free of (from) that law'

Dative

Dative

Instramental

Locative

Ablative

gif mis sei undrinnái mik dáil áiginis

wópida Iesus stibnái mikilái

swegnida ahmin Iesus

sa afar mis gagganda swinþóza mis ist

'give me the portion of property which is coming to me'

'Jesus cried with a loud voice'

'Jesus rejoiced in spirit'

'he who comes after me is mightier than me'

 

The above identifications are not iron-clad, nor should they be taken for actual historical evolution. But they do go a long way to explaining the syntactic descriptions of WG case usage.

 

Like the other Germanic languages, WG has strong and weak nominal declensions. These are terms originally applied by J. Grimm to distinguish two types of declension within Germanic languages. Among nouns, the property of being strong or weak is inherent, each noun being either strong (only) or weak (only). Adjectives, by contrast, can be strong or weak depending on the situation: adjectives are declined strong when indefinite, weak when definite.

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.